So I saw an official Heinz ketchup plant bottle yesterday and I felt good and bad about it. Using renewable sources is awesome don’t get me wrong, but it still does not solve the problem of plastic waste in landfills and in nature! Only 5% of plastics get recycled and the rest end up as waste. While going renewable with the Heinz bottle is a great step forward, many consumers are completely oblivious to what the “plant” bottle is. A grad student from Florida conducted a survey asking random consumers questions regarding the plant bottle. 50% of the participants believed that plant bottles are biodegradable. 68% of the participants believe that PET plant based beverage bottles are better than traditional PET plastic bottles because they are biodegradable.  From the results of the survey it is clear that these average consumers are confused of the capabilities of plant based bottles.  Let me know what you think of the new bottles in the comment box below!

Heinz to Use Plant-Based Bottles Made by Coca-Cola

Share this:

SPARTANBURG, S.C. (Updated April 22, 10:40 a.m. ET) — The joint-venture PET recycling plant that Coca-Cola Co. opened with great fanfare two years ago in Spartanburg, S.C., has stopped making food-grade recycled PET, but hopes to resume that process sometime this summer.

Neither Coke nor United Resource Recovery Corp. LLC ever made any official announcement about the shutdown of those operations at their joint venture plant, NURRC LLC. Only after Plastics News broke the story April 18 that 50 factory workers were laid off in early March, and virtually the entire office staff was laid off two weeks ago did Coke issue a statement to PN that operations had been “curtailed.”

In an email response, the Coca-Cola executive only said that Coke was restructuring the Spartanburg joint venture, which was designed to be the largest bottle-to-bottle PET recycling plant globally. Vitters is general manager of the Plant Bottle packaging platform for Coca-Cola. He was previously director of sustainable packaging.

In a separate statement sent specifically to Plastics News, the Atlanta-based company said “we cannot discuss the specifics of Coca-Cola’s business dealing with NURRC. The joint venture, however, needs to be restructured in light of further business conditions.”

Without providing additional detail, the statement said that “plans are in place to continue to operate” the Spartanburg facility. Similarly, Vitters said “we intend to continue working with processing facilities, throughout the U.S., including NURCC, to supply [recycled] PET to our system.”

There was no immediate response from URRC to inquiries from Plastics News.

Sources also said that NURRC is remiss in its payments to its brokers and materials recovery facilities, and that at least one lawsuit has been filed by a supplier of PET bottles seeking payment. They also said that several NURRC staff employees have been actively inquiring about job possibilities at other plastic recyclers.

In addition, John Burgess, president of Coca-Cola Recycling, has been placed on indefinite leave, sources said. But Vitters said that personnel action was not related to the Spartanburg recycling operation.

The Spartanburg plant had been ballyhooed as the shining star that would enable Coke to achieve its goal of incorporating 10 percent recycled content in its PET bottles by last year and 25 percent by 2015.

But Coke did not meet that goal of 10 percent recycled content for its PET bottles in 2010, and sources said that only about 1 million pounds of recycled PET from the NURRC Spartanburg plant — which is only a fraction of the plant’s nameplate capacity of 56 million pounds — actually wound up back in PET bottles.

“I have heard for a long time that the plant could not meet the specifications for bottles,” said one source.

“Coca-Cola remains committed to our goals of sourcing 25 percent of our PET plastic from recycled and/or renewable material by 2015, and to recover 50 percent of the equivalent bottles and cans used by 2015,” said the company in the statement it emailed to Plastics News.

The “recycled and/or renewable materials” is significant, because Coke has been making a big push in recent months in renewable materials. The company has said it expects to convert all of its plastics packaging to PlantBottle materials — PET made from sugar-cane ethanol — by 2020.

Sources said the Spartanburg plant had undergone three engineering redesigns in an effort to make its process profitable.

“The technology might have been the best several years ago, but it doesn’t work as well as other technologies with the newer, lightweight bottles,” one source said.

In its emailed statement to Plastics News, Coca-Cola’s only comment relative to the technology at the plant was that “new equipment” was being installed.

“We started this joint venture with URRC to test out technology that would increase access to valuable recycled content for use back into our bottles. That desire has not changed.”

The plant never added the second line that it had planned to bring online by the end of 2009 or early 2010, and it struggled to achieve its nameplate capacity of 56 million pounds — 44 million pounds of clear material and 12 million pounds of green material.

Coke’s initial investment in the plant was estimated to be between $45 million and $50 million.

One source said the majority of the plant’s output ended up in lower-end fiber and strapping. The source said one Coke bottling plant had two silos worth of output from the plant that was unusable for bottles.

“In the long-run, it has to work in the marketplace,” said one source. “Its failure is kind of a black eye for Coke.”

The NURRC plant closing is a short-term boost to other recyclers, as it makes more material available in a tight market to PET recyclers such as Clear Path Recycling, Custom Polymers PET, Wellman, Pure Tech Plastics, Phoenix Technologies, Carbonlite Industries, and others.

“That is good news,” for those companies, the source said. It also helped PET bale prices — which had been rising — stabilize in March.

Before the NURRC plant closing, PET reclamation in the U.S. was expected to reach 1.88 billion pounds sometime in 2011. That’s more than double the 847 million-pound PET reclamation capacity at the end of 2008. And tight supplies had already forced the cancellation of three capacity expansions this year, including a second 120 million-pound-per-year line planned by Clear Path.

Sources said the NURRC plant closing was triggered by a request in February for $15 million from Coke to fund the next phase of expansion. NURRC wanted to add a second recycling line to increase production.

When Coke declined to make that investment, that left NURRC without money to continue operations, sources said.

URRC, which owns the joint-venture plant, is looking for investors, sources said. However, other sources speculated that Coke may buy the plant at a greatly reduced price.

One source told Plastics News that Coca-Cola Recycling employees were told in an internal memo that the Coca-Cola Recycling was going to take over NURRC.

“Everything about this plant from Coke has been totally greenwash nonsense from top-to-bottom from Day One,” said one source.

Coca-Cola still has PET recycling plants in Mexico, France, Austria, Switzerland and the Philippines.

By Mike Verespej | PlasticNews.com

Share this:

• The first PET bottle was recycled in 1977.

• An estimated 9,400 curbside collection programs and 10,000 drop-off programs collect PET plastic in the United States, currently.

• Approximate number of PET beverage bottles per pound:
  16 oz. — 18 bottles per pound
  20 oz. — 16 bottles per pound
  1 liter — 12 bottles per pound
  2 liter — 9 bottles per pound
  3 liter — 5 bottles per pound

• Cubic yards conserved in a landfill by recycling PET beverage bottles:
  4,800 recycled 16-ounce bottles saves a cubic yard
  4,050 recycled 20-ounce bottles saves a cubic yard
  3,240 recycled 1-liter bottles saves a cubic yard
  2,430 recycled 2-liter bottles saves a cubic yard
  1,350 recycled 3-liter bottles saves a cubic yard

• Since 1978, manufacturers have reduced the weight of a two-liter bottle by about 29%, from 68 grams to 48 grams.

• Recycling a ton of PET containers saves 7.4 cubic yards of landfill space.

• According to the EPA, recycling a pound of PET saves approximately 12,000 BTU’s.

• The average household generated 42 pounds of PET plastic bottles in the year 2005.

• Custom bottles (which are bottles used for products other than carbonated soft drinks) represent 62% of all PET bottles available for recycling.

• Fourteen 20 oz. PET bottles yield enough fiber for an extra large T-shirt.

• It takes 14 20 oz. PET bottles to make one square foot of carpet.

• It takes 63 20 oz. PET bottles to make a sweater.

• Fourteen 20 oz. PET bottles yield enough fiberfill for a ski jacket.

• It takes 85 20 oz. PET bottles to make enough fiberfill for a sleeping bag.

Used from NAPOR website.

Danny Clark
ENSO Bottles, LLC
866-936-3676
www.ensobottles.com

Share this:

Sonoma, CA, September 25, 2007 – PET (polyethylene terephthalate) bottles have garnered a great deal of media attention recently, some of it raising questions about PET safety. According to the National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR), the trade group for PET packaging, it’s time to clear up any fallacies and set the record straight: Consumers can continue to rely on the safety of PET bottles.

If you drink a single-serve water or carbonated beverage from a plastic bottle, chances are you’re drinking it from PET, identified with a small number “1” or “PETE” on the container side or bottom. The PET bottle is a well-accepted package all over the world and is completely safe to drink from as well as lightweight, unbreakable, and recyclable.

But, can you safely freeze a PET bottle? Yes. There is no danger in the freezing of PET bottles, and no truth to the rumors that dioxins leach from frozen PET bottles. There is no dioxin in PET plastic. Dioxins are formed by combustion in incinerators at temperatures above 1700 degrees F. — and by volcanoes. Furthermore, freezing does not affect PET bottles.

Leave a PET bottle in your hot car? Yes. The idea that PET bottles “leach” chemicals when heated in hot cars is not based on any science, and is unsubstantiated by any credible evidence. This allegation has been perpetuated by emails until it has become an urban legend, but it just isn’t so.

Reuse a PET bottle? Yes. Just wash it first, as you would any other food or beverage container after use.

Do PET bottles contain “bis-phenol A” which some claim can cause birth defects? No. Bis-phenol A is not used to make PET, nor is it used to make any of the component materials used to make PET.

What about the chemicals called “phthalates? They are not in PET. In spite of the similarity of part of PET’s chemical name, PET is not the kind of “phthalate” that is being talked about. The type of “phthalate” about which concern has been raised is used to make various plastics more flexible, and in that role is called a “plasticizer.” PET does not contain plasticizers or the type of “phthalate” that is used in plasticizers.

What about Antimony? Antimony oxide is often used in extremely tiny amounts as a “catalyst” in the production of PET plastic. Its very low toxicity combined with very low extraction rate from PET translates to very, very low risk. Its use in PET does not endanger workers, consumers, or the environment.

NAPCOR Contacts: Dennis Sabourin (707) 996-4207, X13 or Kate Eagles, x16

Share this: